Між екологічною перспективою та глобальним протистоянням: актуальні результати COP26

Валентин Рибачек

Між екологічною перспективою та глобальним протистоянням: актуальні результати COP26

Анотація

Метою дослідження було виявлення впливу рішень COP26 на політичні процеси, енергетичну політику та міжнародне співробітництво. Для досягнення цієї мети використовувались методи історичного аналізу, порівняння політичних позицій ключових учасників конференції, а також аналіз ухвалених резолюцій та їх наслідків. Результати дослідження показали, що COP26 стала важливим етапом у формуванні глобальної кліматичної політики, проте відобразила значні політичні розбіжності між країнами. З одного боку, ухвалені рішення сприяли активізації роботи над відновлюваними джерелами енергії та впровадженню механізмів скорочення викидів. З іншого боку, конференція виявила суперечності у питаннях термінів досягнення вуглецевої нейтральності та масштабів зобовʼязань, що обмежило можливості глобальної координації. Аналіз кліматичного фінансування показав, що розвинені країни, хоча й узяли на себе зобовʼязання збільшити фінансову підтримку країн, що розвиваються, не змогли задовольнити всі їхні вимоги. Це стало причиною політичної напруги, яка заважає ефективній реалізації кліматичних ініціатив. Особливу увагу приділено ролі COP26 у зміцненні та ослабленні міжнародного співробітництва в енергетичній сфері. Було виявлено, що амбітні цілі ЄС і США щодо скорочення викидів значно відрізняються від обережної позиції країн, залежних від викопного палива, таких як Китай і Росія. Дослідження підкреслює необхідність пошуку компромісу між країнами для ефективного подолання кліматичних викликів. Особливу увагу слід приділити створенню механізмів фінансування, які враховують інтереси як розвинених держав, так і країн, що розвиваються. Тільки через зміцнення міжнародного співробітництва та адаптивний підхід до кліматичних зобовʼязань можливо досягти стійких результатів у боротьбі зі зміною клімату

Ключові слова

переговори; потепління; енергетична трансформація; вуглецеві викиди; геополітичні інтереси; відновлювані джерела

Використані джерела

[1] Achakulwisut, P., Erickson, P., Guivarch, C., Schaeffer, R., Brutschin, E., & Pye, S. (2023). Global fossil fuel reduction pathways under different climate mitigation strategies and ambitions. Nature Communications, 14, article number 5425. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41105-z.

[2] Almutairi, K., Almutairi, M.S., Harb, K.M., & Marey, O. (2023). A thorough investigation of renewable energy development strategies through integrated approach: A case study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 45(1), 708-726. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2023.2169786.

[3] Alqaisi, A.F.R., & Almutairi, F.N. (2024). Assessing the gap between environmental legislation and effective implementation: A study and guidelines for enhancing the implementation performance of environmental laws. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(7s), 937-947. doi: 10.52783/jes.3469.

[4] Anderson, K., Broderick, J.F., & Stoddard, I. (2020). A factor of two: How the mitigation plans of “climate progressive” nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways. Climate Policy, 20(10), 1290-1304. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1728209.

[5] Babayomi, O.O., Dahoro, D.A., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Affordable clean energy transition in developing countries: Pathways and technologies. iScience, 25(5), article number 104178. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104178.

[6] Bloomfield, J., & Steward, F. (2022). Strategies for climate change post COP26. The Political Quarterly, 93(2), 278-287. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.13125.

[7] Bracking, S., & Leffel, B. (2021). Climate finance governance: Fit for purpose?. WIREs Climate Change, 12(4), article number e709. doi: 10.1002/wcc.709.

[8] C2ES Statement on Copenhagen Accord. (2009). Retrieved from https://refresh-stg-c2es.pantheonsite.io/press- release/c2es-statement-on-copenhagen-accord/.

[9] Cadman, T., & Hales, R. (2022). COP26 and a framework for future global agreements on carbon market integrity.

The International Journal of Social Quality, 12(1), 76-99. doi: 10.3167/IJSQ.2022.120105.

[10] Carter, N., & Pearson, M. (2024). From green crap to net zero: Conservative climate policy 2015-2022. British Politics, 19, 154-174. doi: 10.1057/s41293-022-00222-x.

[11] Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Yang, M., Osman, A.I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D.W., & Yap, P.-S. (2022). Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20, 2277-2310. doi: 10.1007/s10311-022-01435-8.

[12] Clémençon, R. (2023). 30 Years of international climate negotiations: Are they still our best hope?. The Journal of Environment & Development, 32(2), 114-146. doi: 10.1177/10704965231163908.

[13] Climate Action Tracker. (2022). Retrieved from https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/russian-federation/.

[14] Dooley, K., et al. (2021). Ethical choices behind quantifications of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement.

Nature Climate Change, 11, 300-305. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01015-8.

[15] EU Monitor. (2022). Green Deal: Key to a climate-neutral and sustainable EU. Retrieved from https://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vl9tpq5smfs6?ctx=vhesf063wxu9&.

[16] European Commission. (2021). Speech by President von der Leyen at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_21_5741.

[17] Frey, U.J., & Burgess, J. (2023). Why do climate change negotiations stall? Scientific evidence and solutions for some structural problems. Global Discourse, 13(2), 138-162. doi: 10.1332/204378921X16431423735159.

[18] Gyeltshen, N. (2021). Least developed countries need funds for adaptation at COP26. Retrieved from https://dialogue.earth/en/climate/least-developed-countries-need-funds-for-adaptation-at-cop26/.

[19] Hafezi, R., Wood, D., & Taghikhah, F. (2024). International environmental treaties: An honest or a misguided effort. arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.07574.

[20] Hasan, M. (2022). Climate justice and COP26: A new perspective on the climate crisis. Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 38(3), 242-250. doi: 10.1080/13623699.2022.2118108.

[21] Haug, S., Braveboy-Wagner, J., & Maihold, G. (2021). The “Global South” in the study of world politics: Examining a meta category. Third World Quarterly, 42(9), 1923-1944. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2021.1948831.

[22] Hickel, J., OʼNeill, D.W., Fanning, A.L., & Zoomkawala, H. (2022). National responsibility for ecological breakdown: A fair-shares assessment of resource use, 1970-2017. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(4), 342-349. doi: 10.1016/S2542- 5196(22)00044-4.

[23] Hill, A.C. (2021). What COP26 did and didnʼt accomplish. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/cop26-climate-outcomes-successes-failures-glasgow.

[24] Huang, G., Xu, Z., Qu, X., Cao, J., Long, S., Yang, K., Hou, H., Wang, Y., & Ma, X. (2022). Critical climate issues toward carbon neutrality targets. Fundamental Research, 2(3), 396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.02.011.

[25] IEA. (2022a). Energy system of China. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/countries/china.

[26] IEA. (2022b). Energy fact sheet: Why does Russian oil and gas matter. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/articles/energy-fact-sheet-why-does-russian-oil-and-gas-matter.

[27] International Federation of Social Workers. (2021). Climate justice. Retrieved from https://www.ifsw.org/social-work-action/climate-justice-program/introduction/.

[28] International Renewable Energy Agency. (2022). Renewable energy capacity tracker. Retrieved from https://qery.no/renewable-energy-capacity-tracker/.

[29] Jacobs, M. (2022). Reflections on COP26: International diplomacy, global justice and the greening of capitalism.

The Political Quarterly, 93(2), 270-277. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.13083.

[30] Jiang, W., Cole, M., Sun, J., & Wang, S. (2022). Innovation, carbon emissions and the pollution haven hypothesis: Climate capitalism and global re-interpretations. Journal of Environmental Management, 307(1), article number 114465. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114465.

[31] Kaya, A., & Schofield, L.S. (2020). Which countries send more delegates to climate change conferences? Analysis of UNFCCC COPs, 1995-2015. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16(3), 478-491. doi: 10.1093/fpa/orz031.

[32] Malley, C.S., et al. (2023). A roadmap to achieve the global methane pledge. Environmental Research: Climate, 2, article number 011003. doi: 10.1088/2752-5295/acb4b4.

[33] Markard, J., & Rosenbloom, D. (2022). Phases of the net-zero energy transition and stategies to achieve it. In Routledge handbook of energy transitions (pp. 102-123). New York: Routledge. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.09472.

[34] McDonnell, S. (2023). The COP27 decision and future directions for loss and damage finance: Addressing vulnerability and non‐economic loss and damage. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 32(3), 416-427. doi: 10.1111/reel.12521.

[35] Mizuno, O. (2025). Adaptation: Is securing funding really the top priority for COP negotiations?. Sustainability Science, 20, 315-320. doi: 10.1007/s11625-024-01604-4.

[36] OʼNeill, A. (2023). Emerging market and developing economies: Budget balance between 2019 to 2029 in relation to GDP. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/805549/emerging-market-and-developing-economies-budget-balance-in-relation-to-gdp/.

[37] OECD. (2023). Growth accelerated in the climate finance provided and mobilised in 2021. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/about/news/press-releases/2023/11/growth-accelerated-in-the-climate-finance-provided-and-mobilised-in-2021-but-developed-countries-remain-short.html.

[38] OWD. (2024). Global carbon budget. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions.

[39] Paul, N.E. (2024). Is climate change ungovernable? London Review of International Law, 12(3), 351-372. doi: 10.1093/lril/lrae017.

[40] Perry, K., & Sealey-Huggins, L. (2023). Racial capitalism and climate justice: White redemptive power and the uneven geographies of eco-imperial crisis. Geoforum, 145, article number 103772. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103772.

[41] Qamruzzaman, M., & Karim, S. (2024). Unveiling the synergy: Green finance, technological innovation, green energy, and carbon neutrality. PloS One, 19(10), article number e0308170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308170.

[42] Rickard, S.J. (2024). International negotiations over the global commons. The Review of International Organizations. doi: 10.1007/s11558-024-09566-z.

[43] Salimi Turkamani, H. (2024). The loss and damage fund: A solution to interpretive conflicts of responsibility for climate change? Netherlands International Law Review, 71(2), 327-352. doi: 10.1007/s40802-024-00259-3.

[44] Schaub, S., Tosun, J., & Jordan, A.J. (2024). Climate action through policy expansion and/or dismantling: Country- comparative insights: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 26(3-4), 215-232. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2024.2369640.

[45] Shawn, Y. (2022). Zero COVID in China: What next. The Lancet, 399(10338), 1856-1857. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00873-X.

[46] Skagen, K., & Boasson, E.L. (2024). Climate policy integration as a process: From shallow to embedded integration.

Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 26(3), 279-294. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2024.2334707.

[47] Stankovic, T., Hovi, J., & Skodvin, T. (2023). The Paris Agreementʼs inherent tension between ambition and compliance.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, article number 550. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02054-6.

[48] Sun, T., et al. (2021). Path to net zero is critical to climate outcome. Scientific Reports, 11, article number 22173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01639-y.

[49] Sun, Y., Gao, P., & Razzaq, A. (2023). How does fiscal decentralization lead to renewable energy transition and a sustainable environment? Evidence from highly decentralized economies. Renewable Energy, 206, 1064-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.069.

[50] The U.S. Department of Energy. (2022). The inflation reduction act drives significant emissions reductions and positions America to reach our climate goals. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/policy/inflation-reduction-act-drives-significant-emissions-reductions-and-positions-america-reach.

[51] The Union Cabinet.(2022). Cabinet approves Indiaʼs updated nationally determined contribution to be communicated to the United Nations framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1847812.

[52] Thompson, A. (2024). From rivals to partners: The cooptation of emerging powers into the climate regime.

Contemporary Security Policy, 46(1), 126-149. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2024.2420477.

[53] UNFCCC. (2021a). COP26 sustainability report. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/COP26-Sustainability-Report_Final.pdf.

[54] UNFCCC. (2021b). COP26 speeches and statements. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/cop-26/speeches-and-statements#Statements-given-at-official-opening-ceremony-of-t.

[55] UNFCCC. (2021c). End of coal in sight at COP26. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/news/end-of-coal-in-sight-at- cop26.

[56] UNFCCC. (2021d). Chinaʼs achievements, new goals and new measures for nationally determined contributions. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/China%E2%80%99s%20Achievements%2C%20New%20 Goals%20and%20New%20Measures%20for%20Nationally%20Determined%20Contributions.pdf.

[57] UNFCCC. (2021e). Net zero strategy: Build back greener. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/UK%20Net%20Zero%20Strategy%20-%20Build%20Back%20Greener.pdf.

[58] UNFCCC. (2021f). Updated first nationally determined contribution. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/202203111154---KSA%20NDC%202021.pdf.

[59] UNFCCC. (2021g). First nationally determined contribution under the Paris agreement. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/South%20Africa%20updated%20first%20NDC%20September%202021.pdf.

[60] UNFCCC. (2022a). Indiaʼs updated first nationally determined contribution under Paris Agreement. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-08/India%20Updated%20First%20Nationally%20Determined%20 Contrib.pdf.

[61] UNFCCC. (2022b). United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Irelandʼs nationally determined contribution. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-09/UK%20NDC%20ICTU%202022.pdf.

[62] Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1997, December). Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/docs/cop3/l07a01.pdf.

[63] Copenhagen Accord. (2009, December). Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/l07.pdf.

[64] Paris Agreement. (2015, December). Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.

[65] United Nations. (2021). Secretary-Generalʼs remarks to the media following the Informal Leaders Roundtable on climate action. Retrieved from https://ukraine.un.org/en/145673-secretary-generals-remarks-media-following-informal-leaders-roundtable-climate-action.

[66] Victor, D.G., Lumkowsky, M., & Dannenberg, A. (2022). Determining the credibility of commitments in international climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 12(9), 793-800. doi: 10.1038/s41558-022-01454-x.

[67] Wang, D., & Fang, Y. (2024). Global climate governance inequality unveiled through dynamic influence assessment. NPJ Climate Action, 3(1), article number 75. doi: 10.1038/s44168-024-00159-5.

[68] Wang, Y., Liu, Y., & Gu, B. (2022). COP26: Progress, challenges, and outlook. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 39, 1209-1216. doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-2097-z.

[69] Williams, P.D., & McDonald, M. (Eds.). (2023). Security studies: An introduction. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003247821.

[70] African Development Bank Group. (2025). Working paper 387 − climate change risks and coping strategies in Mozambique: The role of climate-resilient infrastructure. Retrieved from https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/working-paper-387-climate-change-risks-and-coping-strategies-mozambique-role-climate-resilient-infrastructure.

[71] World Bank Group. (2021). World Bank and the European Commission to support Poland to transition out of coal. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/01/27/world-bank-and-european-commission-to-support-poland-to-transition-out-of-coal.

[72] World Bank. (2024a). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD.

[73] World Bank. (2024b). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS.

[74] World Bank. (2024c). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/topic/poverty.

[75] World Bank. (2025). Global economy stabilizes, but developing economies face tougher slog. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/01/16/gep-january-2025-press-release.

[76] Zhang, Y., Pan, C.L., & Liao, H.T. (2021). Carbon neutrality policies and technologies: A scientometric analysis of social science disciplines. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, article number 761736. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.761736.

[77] Ziyu, L., & Chi, Z. (2023). Developing countries being prospective players in climate governance: A case study of Chinaʼs carbon market. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 16(1), 29-44. doi: 10.1093/jwelb/jwac044.

[78] Zhuravel, Y., Artemenko, O., Lytvyn, N., Yara, O., & Uliutina, O. (2023). International experience in the use of alternative energy sources (within the European Union). Law. Human. Environment, 14(3), 46-59. doi: 10.31548/law/3.2023.46

ЦИТУВАТИ

Rybachek, V. (2025). Between the ecological perspective and global confrontation: Current results of COP26. Foreign Affairs, 35(3), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.59214/2663-2675.35(3).2025.89