1. Esmark, A. (2018). Limits to liberal government: An alternative history of governmentality. Administration & Society, 50(2), 240-268.
2. Semyonov, A. (2020). Imperial parliament for a hybrid empire: Representative experiments in the early 20th-century Russian Empire. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 11(1), 30-39.
3. Yeomans, H. (2019). Historical context and the criminological imagination: Towards a three-dimensional criminology. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 19(4), 456-474.
4. Albornoz, N., & Sebastian, C. (2021). Tensions, articulations, and novelty in the ontogenetic development of historical thinking: Contributions of cultural-historical psychology. Theory & Psychology. doi: 10.1177/09593543211028912.
5. Li, X., & Hicks, A. (2016). World polity matters: Another look at the rise of the nation-state across the world, 1816 to 2001. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 596-607.
6. Golden, S. (2020). How to construct a common and consensual multicultural civic discourse. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(5), 576-590.
7. Chayinska, M., Kende, A., & Wohl, M. (2021). National identity and beliefs about historical linguicide are associated with support for exclusive language policies among the Ukrainian linguistic majority. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. doi: 10.1177/1368430220985911.
8. Greenway, T. (2021). Attending to the multidimensional nature of spirituality and faith: Integrating spiritual development and moral foundations theory. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry. doi: 10.1177/0739891320986162.
9. Ogbenika, G., & Michael, P. (2016). Development as obligation and the obligation of development: A philosophical reflection on the nation state in Africa. Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities, 17(2), 141-156.
10. Brett, A., Donaldson, M., & Koskenniemi, M. (Eds.). (2021). History, politics, law: Thinking through the іnternational. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 11. Krol, R. (2021). Germany's conscience. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
12. Osadola, O., & Ajayi, A. (2021). Ethnic politics and national development: Understanding the paradox of Nigerian states. European Modern Studies Journal, 5(2), 351-358.
13. Prodjonoto, K., & Toruan, T. (2020). Building the spirit of defending the state in the middle of national development. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 13(1), 442-460.
14. Fukurai, H. (2019). Original nation approaches to “international” law: Decoupling of the nation and the state and the search for new legal orders. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 26(1), 199-262.
15. Thapa, I. (2020). Nation-state and state-nation theory of nation building. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/344126609_Nation-State_and_State-Nation_Theory_of_Nation_Building.
16. Laine, J.P., Liikanen, I., & Scott, J.W. (Eds.). (2021). Remapping security on Europe’s Northern borders. London: Routledge.
17. Patel, P., & Pearce, J. (2020). Franchisees and loan default on third-party guarantee loans: Evidence from the United States. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(5), 861-877.
18. Mahadevia, D., & Bhatia, N. (2021). Towards new urban agenda: A radical reorientation of urban planning education in India. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 12(2), 187-201.
19. Immel, P. (2020). High-modernist urban planning in Beijing for population control. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 49(3), 291-311.
20. Nourian, F., Alipour, M., & Ache, P. (2021). Model-theory interaction in urban planning: A critical review. Planning Theory. doi: 10.1177/14730952211026693.