Issue: UA Foreign Affairs, №3,2020
Boris Humeniuk, Head of the Department of Public Administration and International Relations of the National Pedagogical University. M. Drahomanov,
The article is devoted to vitally important issue of researching formation conceptual-legal routes in relations between EEC (future EU) and countries of Eastern Mediterranean which stability (or instability) may extremely affect security and normal functioning of European community itself. The start of establishing official relations between EEC and former colonial states of the region such as Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia and first of all Cyprus, the process of their gradual transformation are in the focus of the article. From the very beginning of formation of their policy towards the countries of this region leaders of the EEC paid special attention to official Nicosia considering this capital as a unique bridge between European community and countries of the Eastern Mediterranean in the context of implementation of its foreign strategy in the region. The article underlines that yet since March 1957 when EEC was established its father founders paid huge attention to the countries of the Eastern Mediterranean. The major task of this cooperation between two partners was to secure political, economic and social stability on the southern borders of the European community and create favorable conditions for preserving and further increasing the volume of trade with the countries of the region, providing for transparent and unwavering supply of energy resources from this region to the members of the EEC. The article familiarizes with comprehensive analysis of different stages of formation and implementation of foreign strategy of EEC towards Eastern Mediterranean countries, particularly emphasizes that crucial event in this process took place in 1972 at the Paris Summit when "Global Mediterranean Policy 1972-1992" was adopted. This new strategy opened another one chapter in the history of relations between European Community and countries of the region. The main idea of this new strategy was to elaborate and implement a common, unified approach of the EEC towards former colonial of Africa, Carrebean and Pacific Ocean regions including in this concept first off all countries of Eastern Mediterranean region. But this programme failed and the article explains the reasons, based on numerous experts opinions, negative outcomes of this policy. Actually EEC Continued the practice of establishing new, as a rule, discriminatory treaties with this category of countries of the so-called third world, which did not provide for the achieving by them a full-fledged membership in the Union in the future. The special attention in the article is paid to the police of EEC towards the Republic of Cyprus. This country was one of the first, which signed the Association Agreement with the EEC in 1972 aiming at achieving swift accession to the European community. Unfortunately it didn't happen because of the fact of the invasion of Turkey on the northern part of the island under the pretext to defend rights and freedoms of turkey-cypriot community mainly inhabited in this area of the island. The next very important step in terms of facilitating relations between EEC and Republic of Cyprus was the decision of Counsil of Association of EEC in 1975 to start direct financial cooperation. At that very year the government of the Republic of Cyprus asked for financial support from EEC after Turkish occupation of the northern part of the country which constitutes 37 % of the territory of the island. Brussels took a positive decision to grant this support, dividing it in three tranches: 30 mln ecu (1977), 44 mln ecu (1984) and 62 mln ecu (1989). It meant only that despite the start of military actions that caused huge economic and humanitarian damage to the Republic of Cyprus, which later were transformed in a long-lasted frozen conflict, the Republic of Cyprus remained one the priorities of Brussels policy in the region. Such intensive interest of the EU towards official Nicosia was proved by the fact of accepting by Brussels of application of Nicosia to achieve a status of member of EU club. This favorable and privileged attitude of EU towards Republic of Cyprus can be explained by the following arguments: the country always demonstrated the positive image on the international scene, it was a member of Counsil of Europe and OSCE, Nicosia (Archbishop Makarios - the first president of the RC) was one of the founders of non-aligned movement (the members of this NAM were other Arabian Mediterranean countries as well). Thus there factors were regarded by the leaders of EU as reasonable motive to consider a Republic of Cyprus in the capacity of mediator in the region. Achieving by Republic of Cyprus a full-fledged membership in the EU in May 2004 and legal accession to all corresponding European Union structures has vividly demonstrated both achievements and certain failures of this paradigm in relations between EU and Republic of Cyprus. So far the achieving by Republic of Cyprus a full-fledged membership in EU was regarded by the majority of greek-cypriot community as strong and effective leverage to exert pressure on Ankara by "aligned front" to resolve the Cyprus problem and the expectation of Cypriot community were so serious and long awaited that there failure pushed forward on the Cypriot political surface the feeling of euroscepticism and disappointment. Thus the expertise of Cyprus way towards Eurounion membership is very valuable to other candidates of the club, including first of all Ukraine.
Keywords : EEC, Eastern Mediterranean countries, EEC external strategy, full EU membership
Language of the article : Ukrainian
The date of online posting : 20.04.2020
1.The Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community of 25 March 1957, Annexes and Protocols [Електронний ресурс] // Офіційний електронний портал ЄК – Режим доступу: http://www.proyectos.cchs.csic.es/euroconstitution/library/historic%20documents/Rome/TRAITES_1957_CEE.pdf. 2.Kohler M. The Security Concept of the European Union for the Mediterranean, Security and Environment in the Mediterranean // Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York. - 2004.
3.Hoffmeister F. Legal aspects of the Cyprus problem : Annan Plan and EU accession. // Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. – 2006.
4. Pierros F., Meunier J., Abrams S. Bridges and Barriers. The European Union’s Mediterranean Policy, 1961-1998 // Ashgate. – 1999.
5.Brocza S. The Failure of the EU’s Mediterranean Policies [Електронний ресурс] / Current Concerns No.: 1 / 2012 – Режим доступу: http://www.currentconcerns.ch/index.php?id=1496.
6.Council Regulation 1246/73 of 14 May 1973, OJ 1973, L 133, p. 1.
7.Markesinis B. The British Contribution to the Europe of the Twenty-first Century: The British Academy Centenary Lectures // Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, USA. - 2002.
8.Hoffmeister F. Legal aspects of the Cyprus problem : Annan Plan and EU accession. // Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. – 2006.
9.EEC Financial Protocol of 15 September 1977, OJ 1978, L 332, p. 1.
10.EEC Financial Protocol of 7 July 1983, OJ 1983, L 85, p. 37.
11.EEC Financial Protocol of 30 November 1989, OJ 1990, L 82, p. 33.
12.Euro-Mediterranean Cooperation (Historical) [Електронний ресурс] / European Institute for Research on Mediterranean and Arab Cooperation – Режим доступу: http://www.medea.be/en/themes/euro-mediterranean-cooperation/euro-mediterranean-cooperation-historical.
13.Pierros F., Meunier J., Abrams S. Bridges and Barriers. The European Union’s Mediterranean Policy, 1961-1998 // Ashgate. – 1999.
14.Gomez R. Negotiating the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: Strategic Action in EU Foreign Policy? // Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, Athenaeum Press Ltd.- 2003.
15.Stefanou C. (ed.). Cyprus and the EU: the Road to Accession // Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing Company. - 2005.
16.Tocci N. EU Accession Dynamics and Conflict Rresolution: Catalysing Peace or Consolidating Partition in Cyprus? // Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub. – 2004.
17.The European Council. Essen European Council. [Електронний ресурс] / Reproduced from the Bulletin of the European Communities No. 12/1994 – Режим доступу: http://aei.pitt.edu/1447/1/Essen_Dec_1994.pdf.
18.Strengthening the Mediterranean policy of the European Union: Establishing a Euro-Mediterranean Partnership // Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament no.: COM (94) 427 final, Brussels, 19.10.1994. – 1994.
19.Strengthening the Mediterranean Policy of the European Union: Establishing a Euro-Mediterranean Partnership // Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. No.: COM(94)427 as of 19/10/1994.
20.Strengthening the Mediterranean Policy of the European Union: Establishing a Euro-Mediterranean Partnership // Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. No.: COM(94)427 as of 19/10/1994.
21.Strengthening the Mediterranean Policy of the European Union: Establishing a Euro-Mediterranean Partnership // Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. No.: COM(94)427 as of 19/10/1994.
22.Steinbichler S. The Barcelona Process. An Analysis of the motivation and functionality of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership with a special consideration of the historical aspects of demography and migration [Електронний ресурс] /IDEC S.A. - Режим доступу: http://idec.gr/iier/new/EN/Steinbichler%20Paper%20GR.pdf.
23.Gomez R. Negotiating the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: Strategic Action in EU Foreign Policy? // Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, Athenaeum Press Ltd. – 2003.
24.Швед В.О. Близькосхідний регіон у сучасних стратегіях трансатлантичної спільноти. - Київ: НІСД, 2006. – 242 с.
25.ООН предупреждает: Запад захлестнет новая волна арабской эмиграции [Електронний ресурс] // Режим доступу: http://search.rambler.ru/egi-bin/ramblersearch?short=68words=.
26.Arab Human Development Report - 2002 [Електронний ресурс] // United Nations Development Programme, Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development, 2002. - Режим доступу: http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/regional/arabstates/RBAS_ahdr2002_EN.pdf