Politological Dimension of Wars and Military Conflicts

DOI: 10.46493/2663-2675-2020-11-12-1

Authors:

Serhii Sherhin , Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Professor of Kyiv International University

Abstract.

In the article the wars and conflicts are classified in terms of political science theory. The main attention is paid to paradigmal and conceptual interpretation of contemporary military conflicts in the international relations. These aspects of origins of conflicts and wars have been reflected in classic political science and postmodern concepts authors of which primarily are foreign scientists. Actually, all of them despite of their belonging to the different academic schools recognize states as the main subjects of military conflicts. Moreover, classification of wars and conflicts continues to be the main point in political science. Central point of political researches is a question of ways and means of regulating international conflicts. In this context the problem of transformation of local and regional conflicts in a full-scale (global) war is of special research significance. Emergence of nongovernmental subjects of world politics and new forms of wars caused the necessity to take correctives in analyses of these phenomena. Nevertheless, objective reasons of military conflicts as well as factors and possibilities of their transformation into full-scale wars don’t depend on the postulates of politology.

Keywords : military conflict, war, state, civilization, international relations, paradigms, concepts

Language of the article : Ukrainian

References :

1. Aron P. Paix et Guerre entre les nations. – Paris : Colmann-Levy, 1966. – 794 p.

2. Morgenthau H. Politics among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. 3rd edition. – N.Y. : Alfred A. Knopf, 1963. – 630 p.

3. Циганков П. А. Теория международных отношений: Учеб. пособие. – М. : Гардарики, 2003. – 590 с.

4. Bell D. The End of Ideology : On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties . 2 nd ed. – Cambridge ; London : Harward University Press, 1988. – 540 p.

5. Keohane R., Nye J.  Power and Interdependence. – 2 nd ed. – N.Y. : Harper Collins Publ., 1989. – 315 p.

6. Hoffman F. Conflict in the 21 st Century: The Rise of Hybrid War . – Arlington: Potomac Institute for Policy Strategies, 2007. – 72 р.

7. Mandell L. The Third Wave of Globalization Theory // International Studies Review. – Vol. 9. No 2, 2007. – P. 173 – 196.

8.  Rácz A. Russia’s Hybrid War in Ukraine:Breaking the Enemy’s Ability to Resist. – The Finnish Institute of  International Affairs. – [Електронний ресурс]. – 2015. – Режим доступу: : http://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/514/russia_s_hybrid_war_in_ukraine/

9. За матералами: Гібридна війна. – [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://tribuna.pl.ua/news/5-oznak-gibridnoyi-vijni; http://journals.iir.kiev.ua/index.php/pol_n/article/view/2489/2220; https://tyzhden.ua/World/222024

10. Світова гібридна війна: Український фронт. (під головн. ред. В. П. Горбуліна). – Київ : НІСД, 2017. – 496 с.

11. Сальников В. И. ЛНР и ДНР: в поисках методологии исследования // Журнал исторических, политологических и международных исследований. –  № 3 (59), 2016. – С. 89 – 95.

12. Дудчак А. В., Маначинский А. Я. Третья мировая: «Демократическая» война, как механизм ненасильственного передела мировых ресурсов. – К. : ЧП «Золотые ворота», 2011. – 293 с.

13. Военная сила в международных отношениях. Учебное пособие / Под общ. ред. В. И. Анненкова. М. : Русавиа, 2009. – 490 с.