Back to Issue: No.4, 2025

BRICS expansion as a factor of increasing international tension

Abstract

In the context of the transformation of the world order and the growing influence of the countries of the Global South, it is particularly important to investigate the role and potential impact of the BRICS bloc on the contemporary system of international relations. The purpose of the study was to identify aspects of the functioning of the BRICS bloc in the 21st century in order to identify possible threats to international relations. Content analysis methods were used to analyse news items from Reuters, Deutsche Welle, the U.S. Department of State newsletter, an article from the World Economic Forum, and an analytical report from the Council on Foreign Relations. The opinions of politicians and experts on BRICS were studied using the method of discourse analysis. The results of the study showed that the idea of BRICS appeared in the early 2000s, and the final establishment of the block took place in 2006-2009. Further expansion of the bloc could further polarise international relations, especially given the withdrawal of developing countries from institutions such as the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank in favour of the New Development Bank, which was established in 2013. It was revealed that cooperation within the BRICS framework can set precedents for coordinating votes on international platforms, as is the case during voting at the United Nations General Assembly. A potential factor in increasing international tension is the ability of aggressive governments to avoid the effect of sanctions imposed on them through cooperation in the BRICS, in particular, through the use of other systems such as the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, and not the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications. However, 11,000 banking institutions are involved in the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications, while only 1,300 institutions are involved in the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System. Thus, the expansion of the BRICS can become an element of increasing international tension, but only in the long term, since the BRICS countries do not have a clear vision of the development of the bloc and are in conflict with each other. The practical significance of the study is to assess the geopolitical implications of the BRICS expansion, which can be useful for governments, think tanks, or international organisations

Keywords

sanctions; geopolitics; local currencies; international trade; global governance; polarisation

References

  1. “We don't view BRICS as some sort of threat,” says White House spokesperson. (2024). Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/we-dont-view-brics-as-some-sort-of-threat-says-white-house-spokesperson/articleshow/114446582.cms?from=mdr.
  2. Africa Policy Research Institute. (2023). Analysing the New Development Bank’s core objectives (2016-2022). Retrieved from https://afripoli.org/analysing-the-new-development-banks-core-objectives-2016-2022.
  3. Agarwal, M., & Kumar, S. (2023). BRICS countries’ increasing role in the world economy, including institutional innovation. BRICS Journal of Economics, 4(2), 173-191. doi: 10.3897/brics-econ.4.e99451.
  4. Agarwal, M., Azim, R., & Kumar, S. (2022). BRICS: The 2008 financial crisis and economic performance. BRICS Journal of Economics, 3(2), 21-49. doi: 10.3897/brics-econ.3.e86488.
  5. Beaumont, P.D., Wilhelmsen, J., & Gjerde, K.L. (2024). Reimagining NATO after Crimea: Defender of the rule-based order and truth? Contemporary Security Policy, 45(3), 396-425. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2024.2349393.
  6. Betz, B. (2023). Brazil, China strike trade deal agreement to ditch US dollar. Retrieved from https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/brazil-china-strike-trade-deal-agreement-ditch-us-dollar.
  7. Bouras, W., & Bekhouche, S. (2025). Evolution of the BRICS in the framework of the Global Governance Agenda. Algerian Review of Security and Development, 14(1), 166-174.
  8. Carmody, P. (2024). BRICS'enlargement: Power expansion or contraction in a changing world order? EconPol Forum, 25(1), 14-17.
  9. Chellaney, B. (2024). The BRICS effect. Retrieved from https://www.ipg-journal.io/ua/rubriki/zovnishnja-politika-ta-bezpeka/efekt-briks-2325/.
  10. China, Brazil strike deal to ditch dollar for trade. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/world/china-brazil-strike-deal-to-ditch-dollar-for-trade.
  11. Ciuriak, D. (2023). Expansion aside, the BRICS’ path to growth is unchanged: It’s technology (Opinion paper). Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
  12. Cochrane, L., & Zaidan, E. (2024). Shifting global dynamics: An empirical analysis of BRICS+ expansion and its economic, trade, and military implications in the context of the G7. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), article number 2333422. doi: 10.1080/23311886.2024.2333422.
  13. Dmytriieva, D. (2023). Global dollar's role in international payments rises to a record level – SWIFT. Retrieved from https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/global-dollar-s-role-in-international-payments-1692866638.html.
  14. European Commission. (2021). Ethics and data protection. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ethics-and-data-protection_he_en.pdf.
  15. Feingold, S. (2024). BRICS: Here’s what to know about the international bloc. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/11/brics-summit-geopolitics-bloc-international/.
  16. Ferragamo, M. (2024). What is the BRICS group and why is it expanding? Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-brics-group-and-why-it-expanding.
  17. Freddy, H.J., & Thomas, C.J. (2023). Status competition: The BRICS’ quest for influence in global governance. China Report, 59(4), 388-401. doi: 10.1177/00094455231187054.
  18. García-Herrero, A., Storella, T., & Weil, P. (2024). China’s influence at the United Nations: Words and deeds (Policy brief). Brussels: Bruegel.
  19. González Levaggi, A., & Múgica, T. (2023). Navigating Argentina's BRICS entry: Between domestic dynamics and geopolitical implications (Policy brief No. 2). London: LSE Global South Unit.
  20. Gouvea, R., & Gutierrez, M. (2023). “BRICS Plus”: A new global economic paradigm in the making? Modern Economy, 14(5), 539-550. doi: 10.4236/me.2023.145029.
  21. Heine, J. (2024). Active non-alignment and great power competition in our time. Global Affairs, 1(1), 61-69. doi: 10.1177/29769442251324710.
  22. Hooijmaaijers, B. (2021). The BRICS countries’ bilateral economic relations, 2009 to 2019: Between rhetoric and reality. Sage Open, 11(4). doi: 10.1177/21582440211054128.
  23. Humeniuk, A., & Boiko, V. (2024). The role of Brazil in the new geopolitical environment. Scientific Journal of Mykhailo Drahomanov Ukrainian State University, 22(35), 65-75. doi: 10.31392/UDU-nc.series22.2024.35.08.
  24. Institute of Applied Economic Research. (n.d.). Learn about BRICS. Retrieved from https://www.ipea.gov.br/forumbrics/en/learn-about-brics.html.
  25. Johnston, L. (2024). Brics+ countries are determined to trade in their own currencies – but can it work? Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/brics-countries-are-determined-to-trade-in-their-own-currencies-but-can-it-work-243053.
  26. Kheloufi, S. (2024). The stakes of the Algerian economy within the BRICS group: A prospective study of BRICSA. Journal of North African Economies, 20(35), 147-170.
  27. Lai, H.H., & Lu, A. (Eds.). (2020). Market development and policy for One Belt One Road. London: Academic Press.
  28. Lee, B.T.F., & Sims, J.P. (2024). The BRICS+ expansion, global trade dynamics, and the dedollarization phenomenon. Unnes Political Science Journal, 8(1), 19-29. doi: 10.15294/upsj.v8i1.4432.
  29. Llewellyn, A. (2023). Indonesia’s absence from bigger BRICS echoes decades of non-aligned policy. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2023/8/28/indonesias-absence-from-bigger-brics-echoesdecadesof-non-alignedpolicy.
  30. Martin, N. (2025). BRICS currency: Is Trump's tariff threat justified? Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/en/brics-currency-is-trumps-tariff-threat-justified/a-70934600.
  31. Megre, M., & Ribeiro, G.C. (2024). BRICS and the multipolar worldHorizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 25, 126-135.
  32. Moch, E. (2024). The economic and geopolitical significance of the Brics nations: A comparative analysis of their global influence in the 21st century. East African Journal of Business and Economics, 7(2), 86-100. doi: 10.37284/eajbe.7.2.2310.
  33. Mooradian, M.G. (2024). China’s challenge to the international economic order. Retrieved from https://www.fpri.org/article/2024/01/chinas-challenge-to-the-international-economic-order/.
  34. Nach, M., & Ncwadi, R. (2024). BRICS economic integration: Prospects and challenges. South African Journal of International Affairs, 31(2), 151-166. doi: 10.1080/10220461.2024.2380676.
  35. Naim, C.A., & Hasanah, F. (2024). Deconstructing the empire: BRICS and the rise of a multipolar world. Andalas Journal of International Studies, 13(1), 80-90. doi: 10.25077/ajis.13.1.80-90.2024.
  36. Naumov, S. (2024). The impact of the Soviet Union's collapse on China and the transformation of the world order. Scientific Notes of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, 2, 113-122. doi: 10.32782/2307-7778/2024.2.14.
  37. New Development Bank. (2025a). All projects. Retrieved from https://www.ndb.int/projects/all-projects/?country=&key_area_focus=&project_status=&type_category=&pyearval=#paginated-list.
  38. New Development Bank. (2025b). Infrastructure development financing project. Retrieved from https://www.ndb.int/project/infrastructure-development-financing-project/.
  39. New Development Bank. (n.d.). About NDB. Retrieved from https://www.ndb.int/about-ndb/.
  40. Nogueira, I. (2024). China, the BRICS, and attempts to reshape global governance. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780367565152-rechs79-1.
  41. O’Neill, J. (2001). Building better global economic BRICs. Retrieved from https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/goldman-sachs-research/building-better.
  42. O’Neill, J. (2024). BRICS still doesn't matter. Retrieved from https://www.ipg-journal.io/ua/rubriki/zovnishnja-politika-ta-bezpeka/briks-jak-i-ranishe-nichogo-ne-vazhit-2324.
  43. Özekin, M.K., & Sune, E. (2023). Contesting hegemony: The rise of BRICS and the crisis of US-led western hegemony in the MENA Region. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 21(3), 409-446. doi: 10.14731/kjis.2023.12.21.3.409.
  44. Pacholczak, A. (2024). Critical analysis of the effectiveness of EU financial sanctions against the Russian Federation. Przegląd Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego, 30, 353-383. doi: 10.4467/20801335pbw.24.015.19617.
  45. Papa, M., & Han, Z. (2025). The evolution of soft balancing in informal institutions: The case of BRICS. International Affairs, 101(1), 73-95. doi: 10.1093/ia/iiae278.
  46. Pegu, M. (2024). Russia-China relationship in the context of the war in Ukraine: Bonding over shared ideology or western sanctions. The Bulletin of “Carol I” National Defence University, 13(3), 253-266. doi: 10.53477/2284-9378-24-44.
  47. Plummer, R. (2023). Argentina pulls out of plans to join Brics bloc. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-67842992.
  48. Powell, A. (2013). BRICS leaders optimistic about New Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.voanews.com/a/brics-summit-leaders-optimistic-about-new-development-bank/1629583.html.
  49. Rahn, W. (2025). What will change with Indonesia entering BRICS? Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/en/what-will-change-with-indonesia-entering-brics/a-71240863.
  50. Romchuk, M. (2024). Neutrality in international law: Formation and development of the concept. Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, 4(2), 73-83. doi: 10.31733/2786-491X-2024-2-73.
  51. Ryding, T. (2024). After landslide vote, UN adopts ambitious mandate for three legally binding global tax deals. Retrieved from https://www.eurodad.org/after_landslide_vote_un_adopts_ambitious_mandate_for_three_legally_binding_global_tax_deals.
  52. Saaida, M.B. (2023). The BRICS’ move away from US dollar: The implications for international politics. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 10(7), 35-39. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10700467.
  53. Saudi Arabia is still assessing BRICS membership, minister says. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/saudi-arabia-is-still-assessing-brics-membership,-minister-says/88750888.
  54. Shoba, M. (2023). An appraisal of EU and BRICS relations: Lessons for BRICS. Journal of African Foreign Affairs, 10(1). doi: 10.31920/2056-5658/2023/v10n1a1.
  55. Shofa, J.N. (2024). Indonesia finally seeks BRICS membership. Retrieved from https://jakartaglobe.id/news/indonesia-finally-seeks-brics-membership.
  56. SWIFT. (2025). Swift and sanctions. Retrieved from https://www.swift.com/ru/node/11306.
  57. Tolstov, S.V. (2023). Political and security challenges of multipolarity. In Yu.V. Podrez (Ed.), Ukraine and the world in the face of military challenges (pp. 160-185). Sumy: A.S. Makarenko Sumy State Pedagogical University.
  58. Tran, H. (2024). The underestimated implications of the BRICS Summit in Russia. Retrieved from https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/econographics/the-underestimated-implications-of-the-brics-summit-in-russia/.
  59. Shakil, I. (2025). Trump repeats tariffs threat to dissuade BRICS nations from replacing US dollar. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/markets/currencies/trump-repeats-tariffs-threat-dissuade-brics-nations-replacing-us-dollar-2025-01-31/.
  60. U.S. Department of State. (2025a). Marco Rubio. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/biographies/marco-rubio/.
  61. U.S. Department of State. (2025b). U.S. security cooperation with Saudi Arabia. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/u-s-security-cooperation-with-saudi-arabia/.
  62. Ullah, I., Haider, S.M., & Gohar, M. (2024). BRICS expansion: Prospects and challenges. Research Journal of Human and Social Aspects, 2(1), 52-64.
  63. UNFCCC. (2023). COP28 agreement signals “beginning of the end” of the fossil fuel era. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/news/cop28-agreement-signals-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-fossil-fuel-era.
  64. United Nations General Assembly. (2022). Aggression against Ukraine: Resolution, adopted by the General AssemblyRetrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3959039?ln=en https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/738839?ln=en.
  65. United Nations General Assembly. (2023). Principles of the Charter of the United Nations underlying a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine: Resolution adopted by the General AssemblyRetrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4003921?ln=en https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/738839?ln=en.
  66. United Nations Secretary-General. (2024). Secretary-General's remarks to the 16th BRICS Summit. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2024-10-24/secretary-generals-remarks-the-16th-brics-summit-delivered.
  67. US politician reacts to BRICS’ rapid growth. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2024/03/13/3054249/us-politician-reacts-to-brics-rapid-growth.
  68. Valamontes, A. (2024). Trump's threats to countries dropping the US dollar and the growing challenge from BRICS. Demokritos Scientic Journal, 1(14), article number 1163p. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13927140.
  69. World Bank. (2025). GDP (current US$): Selected BRICS and BRICS+ countries. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD

Suggested citation

Xhelili, S. (2025). BRICS expansion as a factor of increasing international tension. Foreign Affairs, 35(4), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.59214/2663-2675.35(3).2025.130
Submit an article