The role of diplomatic services in shaping international image: Ukrainian diplomacy before and after 24 February 2022

Iuliia Tsyrfa; Nataliia Bielousova

The role of diplomatic services in shaping international image: Ukrainian diplomacy before and after 24 February 2022

Abstract

The study examined the role of public diplomacy, cultural diplomacy, economic cooperation, and digital tools as critical components in shaping a country’s international image on a global scale. The aim was to analyse how these instruments influenced global perceptions of Ukraine and the outcomes they generated for the country amidst of the war. The research employed methods of analysing international communication, public diplomacy, and Ukraine’s economic and cultural activities following the invasion. Particular emphasis was placed on the impact of these initiatives on international support for Ukraine and its relations with global partners. Furthermore, the study highlighted public diplomacy as a pivotal mechanism in Ukraine’s efforts to secure international backing and counter Russian propaganda. Since the onset of the war, public diplomacy efforts, including cultural initiatives and the national branding campaign “Ukraine Now”, have gained significant momentum, facilitating the dissemination of accurate information about the situation in Ukraine worldwide. Economic diplomacy has also been effectively utilised to secure foreign investments and humanitarian aid, while digital diplomacy has enabled swift communication with the global community, particularly through social media platforms. Cultural projects have served as vital avenues for promoting Ukrainian artists and raising awareness of national culture during the war. Moreover, Ukrainian cultural diplomacy has not only promoted the nation’s cultural values but has also highlighted its struggle for freedom and independence. The findings of this study can be employed by governmental bodies, diplomatic institutions, cultural organisations, and civil society to develop effective strategies for international communication, advancing national interests, and garnering international support in times of conflict and crisis

Keywords

political efforts; humanitarian aid; full-scale invasion; integration; soft power; state identity; cultural ties

References

[1] Adler, N. (2022). Ukraine’s Zelenskyy: A wartime statesman for the social media age. Retrieved from https://www. aljazeera.com/features/2022/3/3/ukraines-zelenskyy-a-wartime-statesman-for-the-social-media-age.

[2] Agreement on Security Cooperation and Long-Term Support between Ukraine and the Federal Republic of Germany. (2024, February). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/news/ugoda-pro-spivrobitnictvo-u-sferi-bezpeki-ta-dovgostrokovu-p-88985.

[3] Agreement on Security Cooperation between Ukraine and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. (2024, January). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/news/ugoda-pro-spivrobitnictvo-u-sferi-bezpeki-mizh-ukrayinoyu-ta-88277.

[4] Al-Kassimi, K. (2023). Nato’s Anglo-American identity and the Ukrainian crisis from an ontological security perspective – can a realist international system give diplomacy a chance? Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2200665.

[5] Axyonova, V., & Lozka, K. (2024). Diplomacy beyond the state: Ukrainian think tank experts as wartime diplomacy actors. European Security, 33(4), 557-575. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2024.2350465.

[6] Benedikter, R. (2023). The new global direction: From “one globalization” to “two globalizations”? Russia’s war in Ukraine in global perspective. New Global Studies, 17(1), 71-104. doi: 10.1515/ngs-2022-0038.

[7] Blake, M. (2022). How Zelenskyy emerged as the antithesis of Putin and proved you don’t need to be a strongman to be a great leader. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/how-zelenskyy-emerged-as-the-antithesis-of-putin-and- proved-you-dont-need-to-be-a-strongman-to-be-a-great-leader-178485.

[8] Brighi, E., & Giusti, S. (2023). Italian diplomacy and the Ukrainian crisis: The challenges (and cost) of continuity. Contemporary Italian Politics, 15(2), 190-204. doi: 10.1080/23248823.2023.2195776.

[9] Chaban, N., & Elgström, O. (2023). Russia’s war in Ukraine and transformation of EU public diplomacy: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of European Integration, 45(3), 521-537. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2023.2190107.

[10] Crisis in Ukraine 2022: 6 months of humanitarian response. (2022). Retrieved from http://surl.li/rvtpug.

[11] Dylan, H., & Maguire, T.J. (2022). Secret intelligence and public diplomacy in the Ukraine war. In Survival: August - September 2022 (pp. 25-67). London: Routledge.

[12] Hadfield, A., & Whitman, R.G. (2023). The diplomacy of “Global Britain”: Settling, safeguarding and seeking status. International Politics. doi: 10.1057/s41311-023-00489-x.

[13] Kan, K. (2024). The impact of digital diplomacy on security: The case of the Russia-Ukraine War. In E. Akıllı, B. Güneş & O. Güner (Eds.), Digital diplomacy in the OSCE region. Contributions to international relations (pp. 101-111). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-50966-7_10.

[14] Lee, S.T. (2023). A battle for foreign perceptions: Ukraine’s country image in the 2022 war with Russia. Place Brand Public Diplomacy, 19, 345-358. doi: 10.1057/s41254-022-00284-0.

[15] Manor, I. (2023). “Chapter 17: Digital public diplomacy”. In A research agenda for public diplomacy (pp. 267-280). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781802207323.00026.

[16] Manor, I., & Huang, Z.A. (2022). Digitalization of public diplomacy: Concepts, trends, and challenges. Communication and the Public, 7(4), 167-175. doi: 10.1177/20570473221138401.

[17] Matiaszczyk, N. (2024). City diplomacy as a mechanism of multi-level solidarity and support for Ukraine: A study of the changes following the 2022 Russian invasion. Journal of Eurasian Studies. doi: 10.1177/18793665241254835.

[18] Maurer, H., Whitman, R., & Wright, N. (2023). The EU and the invasion of Ukraine: A collective responsibility to act? International Affairs, 99(1), 219-238. doi: 10.1093/ia/iiac262.

[19] Nation Brands Index 2023: Japan takes the lead for the first time in NBI history. (2023). Retrieved from https://www. ipsos.com/en/nation-brands-index-2023.

[20] Popovski, V., & Malhotra, A. (2023). Reimagining the international legal order. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003388821.

[21] Public Law of USA No. 118-50 “Making Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2024, and for other Purposes”. (2024, April). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/815/text.

[22] Seheda, O., & Smolianiuk, V. (2020). Modern processes of digitalization in diplomatic service of Ukraine and Kuwait. Modern Historical and Political Issues, 42, 77-88. doi: 10.31861/mhpi2020.42.77-88.

[23] Speech by Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the Ukraine Recovery Conference. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.president. gov.ua/en/news/vistup-volodimira-zelenskogo-na-ukraine-recovery-conference-91437.

[24] Stivachtis, Y.A. (2023). Great power diplomacy in the digital age. In F. Onditi, K. McLarren, G. Ben-Nun, Y.A. Stivachtis & P. Okoth (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of diplomatic thought and practice in the digital age (pp. 287-310). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-28214-0_13.

[25] Szulecki, K., & Overland, I. (2023). Russian nuclear energy diplomacy and its implications for energy security in the context of the war in Ukraine. Nature Energy, 8, 413-421. doi: 10.1038/s41560-023-01228-5.

[26] Ventura, S. (2024). War and its imagery: The visual narrative of the Ukrainian state’s Instagram account Ukraine. Ua as a tool of digital public diplomacy. International Journal of Strategic Communication. doi: 10.1080/1553118X.2024.2395407.

[27] Vidnyanskyj, S. (2023). The UN and Ukrainian diplomacy in the struggle for independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. International Relations of Ukraine: Scientific Searches and Findings, 32, 10-44. doi: 10.15407/mzu2023.32.010.

[28] Vlaeminck, E. (2021). European digital diplomacy towards Russia: A cross-country social media analysis. In F. Roumate (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and digital diplomacy (pp. 131-143). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-68647-5_10.

[29] Welslau, L.M., & Selck, T.J. (2024). Geopolitics in the ESC: Comparing Russia’s and Ukraine’s use of cultural diplomacy in the Eurovision song contest. New Perspectives, 32(1), 5-29. doi: 10.1177/2336825X231222000.

[30] Wright, K.A.M. (2023). Correction to: Gendered silences in Western responses to the Russia-Ukraine war. Place Brand Public Diplomacy, 19, article number 241. doi: 10.1057/s41254-023-00297-3.

Suggested citation

Tsyrfa, Iu., & Bielousova, N. (2024). The role of diplomatic services in shaping international image: Ukrainian diplomacy before and after 24 February 2022. Foreign Affairs, 34(6), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.59214/ua.fa/6.2024.30