Back to Issue: No.3, 2024

Right-wing and left-wing populism in the EU and their impact on democratic processes

Abstract

Contemporary European populism, which has become particularly widespread in the last decade of the 21st century, is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon whose impact on democratic institutions has not been fully studied. The aim of this research was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the ideological foundations, electoral successes, and impact of populist movements on the functioning of democratic institutions in the EU. The study employed a comparative analysis method to identify the differences between right-wing and left-wing populism, an analysis of the programmatic documents of populist parties, a statistical analysis of electoral data, and the activities of populist governments. The main results of the study demonstrated the ambivalent nature and multivariate manifestations of populism in contemporary Europe. Significant ideological differences were identified between right-wing and left-wing populism, particularly in interpreting the concept of “the people”, the perception of fundamental societal divisions, and approaches to economic policy. An analysis of electoral successes demonstrated a growing support for right-wing populists in many EU countries, while left-wing populist forces showed a more ambiguous dynamic. The study of the impact of populist governments on the functioning of democratic institutions revealed serious challenges to the rule of law in Central and Eastern European countries, but less radical consequences in Southern Europe. It was established that the activities of right-wing populist governments in Hungary and Poland led to a systematic undermining of the principles of the rule of law through restrictions on the independence of the judiciary, freedom of the media, and the rights of the opposition. In contrast, left-wing populist governments in Greece and Spain primarily focused on socioeconomic reforms, avoiding the systematic undermining of democratic institutions. The research results revealed a growing trend towards polarisation of the political spectrum in many EU countries, which creates new challenges for the functioning of democratic institutions and maintaining the unity of the European Union. It was established that the impact of populism on democratic processes in the EU is contextually dependent and varies depending on national characteristics and the ideological orientation of populist forces. The research results can be used by public and governmental organisations and programs that promote political education and a critical approach to political choice

Keywords

Euroscepticism; nationalism; social justice; xenophobia; rule of law; electoral dynamics; political polarisation

References

[1] Bedock, C., Best, V., Otjes, S., & Weisskircher, M. (2023). A policy like no other? The populist radical right challenge in the field of democracy reform. Party Politics, 29(4), 661-671. doi: 10.1177/13540688221089126.

[2] Bergmann, E. (2018). Dissecting populism. In Conspiracy & populism: The politics of misinformation (pp. 71-97). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-90359-0_4.

[3] Bichay, N. (2024). Populist radical-right junior coalition partners and liberal democracy in Europe. Party Politics, 30(2), 236-246. doi: 10.1177/13540688221144698.

[4] Brause, S.D., & Kinski, L. (2024). Mainstream party agenda-responsiveness and the electoral success of right-wing populist parties in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(2), 295-323. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2022.2155214.

[5] Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2012, November). Retrieved from https://fra.europa.eu/en/ eu-charter/article/11-freedom-expression-and-information.

[6] Chiopris, C., & Nalepa, M. (2024). Democratic backsliding in Poland in light of rule of law accountability to the European UnionEmory Law Journal, 73(5), article number 1291.

[7] Crum, B., & Oleart, A. (Eds.). (2023). Populist parties and democratic resilience: A cross-national analysis of populist partiesʼ impact on democratic pluralism in Europe. New York: Routledge.

[8] Crum, B., Oleart, A., & Overeem, P. (2023). Introduction: Populist parties, pluralism, and democratic systems in Europe. In B. Crum & A. Oleart, (Eds.). Populist parties and democratic resilience (pp. 1-19). Routledge. New York: Routledge.

[9] Fernández-García, B., & Valencia-Sáiz, Á. (2023). Populism in Southern Europe. In C. García-Rivero (Ed.), Democracy fatigue: An East European epidemy (pp. 215-239). Budapest: Central European University Press. doi: 10.1515/9789633866405-013.

[10] Fossum, J.E. (2023). In what sense does right-wing populism pose a democratic challenge for the European Union? Social & Legal Studies, 32(6), 930-952. doi: 10.1177/09646639231153306.

[11] Fossum, J.E. (2024). Populism and segmentation in contemporary Europe. In L. Antoniolli & C. Ruzza (Eds.), The rule of law in the EU: Challenges, actors and strategies (pp. 35-54). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978- 3-031-55322-6_3.

[12] France: Marine Le Penʼs far-right party makes historic gains in EU elections. (2024). Retrieved from https://www. euronews.com/my-europe/2024/06/09/france-marine-le-pens-far-right-party-makes-historic-gains-in-eu- elections.

[13] Halmai, G. (2024). From liberal democracy to illiberal populist autocracy: Possible reasons for Hungaryʼs autocratization. Hague Journal on the Rule of Lawdoi: 10.1007/s40803-024-00231-6.

[14] Isaloo, A.S. (2023). Racism and the far right. In Social justice in a turbulent era (pp. 47-66). London: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781803926155.00008.

[15] Judgment of the Court in the Case No. 6-64 “Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L. Reference for Preliminary Ruling: Giudice Conciliatore di Milano – Italy”. (1964, July). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61964CJ0006.

[16] Kioupkiolis, A., & Katsambekis, G. (2019). New left populism contesting and taking power: The cases of SYRIZA and Podemos 1. In G. Charalambous & G. Ioannou (Eds.), Left radicalism and populism in Europe (pp. 129-155). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781351133630.

[17] Miglietta, A., & Loera, B. (2021). Modern forms of populism and social policies: Personal values, populist attitudes, and ingroup definitions in support of left-wing and right-wing welfare policies in Italy. Genealogy, 5(3), article number 60. doi: 10.3390/genealogy5030060.

[18] Migration and asylum in Europe – 2023 edition. (2023). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/interactive- publications/migration-2023#about-this-publication.

[19] Möller, K. (2023). From Jacobin flaws to transformative populism: Left populism and the legacy of European social democracyConstellations, 30(3), 309-324.

[20] Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C.R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[21] Otjes, S., Ivaldi, G., Jupskås, A.R., & Mazzoleni, O. (2018). Itʼs not economic interventionism, stupid! Reassessing the political economy of radical right-wing populist parties. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(3), 270-290. doi: 10.1111/ spsr.12302.

[22] Pappas, T.S. (2019). Populism and liberal democracy: A comparative and theoretical analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[23] Pech, L., Wachowiec, P., & Mazur, D. (2021). Polandʼs rule of law breakdown: A five-year assessment of EUʼs (in) action. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 13(1). doi: 10.1007/s40803-021-00151-9.

[24] Petrakos, G., Rontos, K., & Salvati, L., Vavoura, C., & Vavouras, I. (2024). Income inequality in the over-indebted Eurozone countries and the role of the excessive deficit procedure. Open Economies Review, 35, 301-322. doi: 10.1007/ s11079-023-09720-x

[25] Pirro, A.L., & Van Kessel, S. (2017). United in opposition? The populist radical rightʼs EU-pessimism in times of crisis. Journal of European Integration, 39(4), 405-420. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1281261.

[26] Rule of law: New mechanism aims to protect EU budget and values. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.europarl. europa.eu/topics/en/article/20201001STO88311/rule-of-law-new-mechanism-aims-to-protect-eu-budget- and-values.

[27] Ruth-lovell, S.P., & Grahn, S. (2023). Threat or corrective to democracy? The relationship between populism and different models of democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 62(3), 677-698. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12564.

[28] Scanlan, M.A. (2022). Inclusionary populism: Old antagonisms, new challenges(Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK).

[29] Scanni, F.M. (2023). Opposites but similar? Technocracy and populism in contemporary European democracies. Administration & Society, 55(5), 1007-1029. doi: 10.1177/00953997231158341.

[30] Schraff, D., & Pontusson, J. (2023). Falling behind whom? Economic geographies of right-wing populism in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(6), 1519-1619. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2278647.

[31] Standard Eurobarometer 101 – Spring 2024. (2024). Retrieved from https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/ detail/3216.

[32] Svolik, M.W., Avramovska, E., Lutz, J., & Milačić, F. (2023). In Europe, democracy erodes from the right. Journal of Democracy, 34(1), 5-20. doi: 10.1353/jod.2023.0000.

[33] Treaty on European Union (Consolidated version). (2020, March). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal- content/glossary/suspension-clause-article-7-of-the-treaty-on-european-union.html.

[34] Venice Commission. (2011). Report on the rule of law, adopted by the venice commission at its 86th plenary meeting. Retrieved from https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-e.

[35] Webber, J. (2023). Understanding populism. Social & Legal Studies, 32(6), 849-876. doi: 10.1177/09646639231156144.

Suggested citation

Fekolli, S., & Cela, E. (2024). Right-wing and left-wing populism in the EU and their impact on democratic processes. Foreign Affairs, 34(3), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.46493/2663-2675.34(3).2024.67
Submit an article