Back to Issue: No.4, 2023

Current trends in the military-industrial integration of the EU countries and implications for Ukraine

Abstract

In the face of common security challenges, the issue of protecting civilised countries from external military aggression is of utmost importance for the entire European continent. The research aims to analyse the existing integration processes in Europe and extrapolate them to the military-industrial complex of Ukraine since the Ukrainian state is an outpost of the European Union, where the entire range of modern military technologies is used. The objectives of the study are to identify trends in the military industries of the leading European countries and to assess the prospects for their further integration in the context of the current external military aggression. The key indicators were collected and analysed using statistical and regression analysis, as well as the longitudinal method. The study provided results on the development of defence spending in individual countries, data on the participation of EU countries in joint projects, the scope of sanctions imposed on the aggressor country, indicators of Ukraine's participation in the common customs area, and the volume of military assistance from partner countries. The analysis of the data led to the conclusion that the defence capability of both Ukraine and the entire European Union has significantly improved. It was also found that the replacement of outdated Soviet standards with modern Western ones has led to a significant increase in defence capabilities. In addition, the study found that the unjustified armed aggression against Ukraine strengthened relations between the countries of the European Defence Agency and gave them an impetus to develop collective defence capabilities and conclude joint agreements involving military-industrial complexes. From a practical point of view, the obtained indicators of changes on the continent made it possible to draw conclusions about the directions of further integration and to correct the identified shortcomings

Keywords

weapons; war; weapons standards; re-equipment; defence technology; security strategy

References

  1. Alcaro, R. (2022). More integration, less autonomy: The EU in Europe’s new order. Retrieved from https://www. jointproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/joint_b_19.pdf.
  2. Bollfrass, A.K., & Herzog, S. (2022). The war in Ukraine and the global nuclear orderSurvival Online, 64(4), 7-32.
  3. “Customs visa-free” in numbers: About 4.5 thousand transit declarations in 7 months of international application of NCTS. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.mof.gov.ua/uk/news/mitnii_bezviz_v_tsifrakh_blizko_45_tis_tranzitnikh_ deklaratsii_za_7_misiatsiv_mizhnarodnogo_zastosuvannia_ncts-3985.
  4. Defence data 2020-2021. Key findings and analysis. (2021). Retrieved from https://eda.europa.eu/publications-anddata/brochures/eda-defence-data-2020-2021.
  5. Ditrych, O., & Kucera, T. (2023). Defence cooperation and change: How defence industry integration fostered development of the European security community. Cooperation and Conflict, 58(1), 129-152. doi: 10.1177/00108367221099086.
  6. EDA annual report. (2022). Retrieved from https://eda.europa.eu/publications-and-data/latest-publications/annualreport-2022.
  7. European defence in a changed strategic environment - EDA 2022 annual report. (2023). Retrieved from https:// eda.europa.eu/news-and-events/news/2023/05/08/european-defence-in-a-changed-strategic-environment-edapublishes-its-2022-annual-report.
  8. Fernández, O., Vandendriessche, M., Saz-Carranza, A., Agell, N., & Franco, J. (2023). The impact of Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine on public perceptions of EU security and defence integration: A big data analysis. Journal of European Integration, 45(3), 463-485. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2023.2183392.
  9. Gaur, A., Settles, A., & Väätänen, J. (2023). Do economic sanctions work? Evidence from the russia-Ukraine conflict. Journal of Management Studiesdoi: 10.1111/joms.12933.
  10. Genschel, P., Leek, L., & Weyns, J. (2023). War and integration. The russian attack on Ukraine and the institutional development of the EU. Journal of European Integration, 45(3), 343-360. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2023.2183397.
  11. Handl, V., Nigrin, T., & Mejstřík, M. (2023). Turnabout or continuity? The German Zeitenwende and the reaction of the V4 countries to it. Journal of European Integration, 45(3), 503-519. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2023.2190110.
  12. Kim, T., & Ukrainets, Yu. (2022). Military-industrial complex in the modern world economy:  Preconditions, factors, development trends. Economy and Society, 39. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2022-39-33.
  13. Kruglii, O. (2022). Peculiarities of translation of military terms (on the example of military-industrial terminology). Retrieved from http://www.economy-confer.com.ua/full-article/3893/
  14. Kulahin, K., Solonets, O., Vedmid, O., Kvitkin, K., & Borysenko, M. (2022). Reformation of the life cycle management national system of armament and military equipment according to NATO standards. Weapon Systems and Military Equipment, 3(71), 24-34. doi: 10.30748/soivt.2022.71.04.
  15. Kyzymenko, K., & Kravchenko, M. (2021). Technological development of the defense industry in the leading countries of the world. In The 8th International scientific and practical conference “Actual trends of modern scientific research” (pp. 668-672). Munich: MDPC Publishing.
  16. Martins, B., & Mawdsley, J. (2021). Sociotechnical imaginaries of EU defence: The past and the future in the European defence fund. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(6), 1458-1474. doi: 10.1111/jcms.13197.
  17. Mayberry, A. (2022). Defense integration and economic growth in the North Atlantic. PlumX Metricsdoi: 10.2139/ ssrn.4281186.
  18. Ratti, L., & Leonardi, A. (2023). The role of NATO in European integration. In NATO in the Post-Cold war era (pp. 109131). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Shea, J. (2020). European defence after Brexit: A plus or a minus? European View, 19(1), 88-94. doi: 10.1177/1781685820921617.
  20. Smetana, M., & Onderco, M. (2023). From Moscow with a mushroom cloud? Russian public attitudes to the use of nuclear weapons in a conflict with NATO. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 67(2-3), 183-209. doi: 10.1177/00220027221118815.
  21. Steiner, N., Berlinschi, R., Farvaque, E., Fidrmuc, J., Harms, P., Mihailov, A., Neugart, M., & Stanek, P. (2023). Rallying around the EU flag: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and attitudes toward European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(2), 283-301. doi: 10.1111/jcms.13449.
  22. Stuzhuk, Yu. (2022). Cooperation between Ukraine and the Great Britain in the russian-Ukrainian war conditions.Ensuring the Activities of the Armed Forces, 2(75), 135-140. doi: 10.33099/2304-2745/2022-2-75/135-140.
  23. The World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. (2021). Retrieved from https://data. worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD.
  24. Treaty No. 994_017 “On the establishment of the European Community”. (1992, February). Retrieved from https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_017#Text.
  25. Ukraine support tracker. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukrainesupport-tracker/.
  26. Ünal, D.T. (2023). Evaluation of the positive impacts of e-customs implementations on foreign trade by fuzzy AHP method. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 11(1), 310-319. doi: 10.15295/bmij.v11i1.2206.
  27. Vojtech, O., & Vojtech, K. (2022). Current mechanisms for implementing international military cooperation measures in the context of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement within the framework of the common security and defense policy. International Cooperation in the Military Sphere, 3(76), 41-45. doi: 10.33099/2304-2745/2022-3-76/41-45.

Suggested citation

Leshchenko, K. (2023). Current trends in the military-industrial integration of the EU countries and implications for Ukraine. Foreign Affairs, 33(4), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.46493/2663-2675.33(4).2023.8-21
Submit an article